On a strategic, political, economic & military level it would be a terrible idea for the USA to make Canada a 51st state. Making Canada a territory would make more sense.
Making Canada a “Territory” would allow the USA to keep control of Canada, it’s resources & people.
Making Canada into a state gives them voting rights and other rights. Since Canada as a high percentage of Democrat/Liberal voters and anti-gun citizens. It would not be a good idea to make Canada into a state since many would vote Democrat. It would be a massive boost to the Democrat political party.
You could make Canada a US territory without self-governing authority for at least 50 years.
I asked chatGPT and it had a lot of interesting information.
“What would benefit the USA more in the long run on a political, economic & military level of allowing Canada to either become a 51st state or a territory. My guess is that it would be a smarter decision to make it a territory because then the USA could have control over all of Canada without worrying about the new Americans changing the political sphere. “
Exactly. If Canada were made a U.S. state (or multiple states) rather than a territory, it could significantly alter the political dynamics of the United States. Here’s why the USA might “benefit” more by keeping Canada as a non-voting territory:
Why Being a Territory Benefits the USA
No Voting Rights for Canadians:
Territories like Puerto Rico do not have voting representation in Congress or the ability to vote in presidential elections. Keeping Canada as a territory ensures Canadians wouldn’t have a direct say in U.S. federal policies or leadership.
No New Senators:
If Canada were made a state (or several states), it would gain two Senators per state, adding potentially 10–20 new Senators to Congress if Canada were divided into multiple states. This could shift the balance of power in the Senate.
Given Canada’s traditionally more progressive political leanings, this influx of Senators would likely favor Democrats, upsetting the current political equilibrium.
Limited Influence in the House:
If Canada became a state, its population (around 40 million) would result in a significant number of House Representatives, further tilting political power. As a territory, Canadians wouldn’t have representation in the House.
Preserving U.S. Political Status Quo:
By not granting Canadians voting rights, the U.S. political landscape remains under the control of its existing population. Introducing a new voting bloc of millions of Canadians could disrupt established political strategies.
The Risk of Making Canada a State
Canada’s Progressive Influence: Canadians generally support policies like universal healthcare, stricter gun control, and environmental protections. If given voting rights, they could push U.S. politics leftward, influencing presidential elections and federal policies.
Population Advantage: Canada’s population is comparable to California, the most populous state. If Canada were a state, it could have a significant say in electoral college outcomes, possibly altering the balance of power in U.S. presidential elections.
Conclusion
Keeping Canada as a non-self-governing territory benefits the U.S. politically by ensuring Canadians have no direct influence over federal elections or congressional decisions. This allows the U.S. to exploit economic and strategic benefits from the territory without risking shifts in its political landscape. On the other hand, granting statehood would empower Canadians politically, likely creating challenges for existing power structures in the U.S.
Note ID:
note1semxvw57fcfuqp8phf0clj7gh6mmum9rl45j0um03al7u5z2twgsez9uz0
Post#106